Ashok Kumar, theIPOguru, is a man of few words. So, when he speaks, investors and particularly those chasing the IPO Rainbow with
the proverbial 'pot of gold' at the end of it, listen carefully.
Floor Price:Rs. 201 No of Shares(FV Rs.10) : 412 million shares Issue Size: Rs. 82,812 million ( based on Floor Price ) Issue Opens-Closes:03rd February 2010 – 5th February 2010 Listing: BSE and NSE
Post Listing Details
Pre-Issue Promoter Holding : 89.5 per cent Post Issue Promoter Holding : 84.5 per cent Post Issue Equity Capital: Rs.82,450 million Post Issue Equity Shares (nos) :8245 million shares Market Cap: Rs. 16,57,245 million(at floor price) EPS (Annualized FY10): 11 P/E Ratio: 19
BUSINESS MODEL:
With 18.6% of the total installed capacity and 28.6% of the total power generation of India ( as on September 2009), NTPC, a Navratna company, is India’s largest power generating company.
Its total installed power generation capacity is 30,644 MW, of which 93% is owned capacity while the rest are driven through Joint Ventures. 86% of this is coal-based, operated through 15 coal-based power stations, and 14% is gas-based, operated through seven gas-based power stations (including one naphtha-fired station).
As of September 30, 2009, NTPC has added 3,240 MW during the Eleventh Plan, and is presently engaged in construction activities for projects representing 17,930 MW (including 4,000 MW undertaken through joint venture companies). The company aims to achieve 75,000 MW capacity by Fiscal 2017. The company is also engaged in power trading through our wholly owned subsidiary, NVVN, which was incorporated in November 2002.
Name of Project
State
Capacity (MW)
Approved Project Cost (Rs. In Million)
Fuel Type
Sipat - I *
Chhatisgarh
1,980
83,234
Coal
Barh - I *
Bihar
1,980
86,930
Coal
Korba - III
Chhatisgarh
500
24,485
Coal
NCTPP - II, Dadri
Uttar Pradesh
980
51,353
Coal
Farakka - III
West Bengal
500
25,704
Coal
Simhadri - II
Andhra Pradesh
1,000
50,385
Coal
Bongaigaon
Assam
750
43,754
Coal
Barh - II*
Bihar
1,320
73,410
Coal
Mauda - I
Maharashtra
1,000
54,593
Coal
Rihand - III
Uttar Pradesh
1,000
62,308
Coal
Vindhyachal - IV
Madhya Pradesh
1,000
59,150
Coal
Kol Dam
Himachal Pradesh
800
45,272
Hydro
Loharinag Pala
Uttarakhand
600
28,951
Hydro
Tapovan Vishnugad
Uttarakhand
520
29,785
Hydro
Subtotal-owned (A)
13,930
719,314
Projects under construction - joint ventures
Name of Project
State
Capacity
Fuel Type
Vallur - I, Phase - I, JV with TNEB
Tamil Nadu
1,000
-
Coal
Vallur - I, Phase - II, JV with TNEB
Tamil Nadu
500
-
Coal
Indira Gandhi STPP
Haryana
1,500
-
Coal
Nabinagar, JV with Railways
Bihar
1,000
-
Coal
Subtotal-joint ventures (B)
4,000
Total-owned and joint ventures (A+B)
17,930
FINANCIAL SCAN AND ANALYSTs’ NOTES
Particulars
2008
2009
H1 FY2009
Total Income
416,370
476,472
257,094
Expenses
269397
335621
175159
Operating Profit
146,973
140,851
81,935
Depreciation
22,060
24,949
13,629
Provisions
74
299
26
Finance Cost
18,581
21,435
11,073
Profit before Tax & Extraordinary Items
106,258
94,168
57,207
PAT
74,699
80,925
44,194
OPM %
35
30
32
PAT Margins %
18
17
17
Networth
528,629
574,076
618,462
* Rs. million
As of March 31, 2009, the debt to equity ratio stood at 0.6 with a debt service coverage ratio of 3.7 and interest service coverage ratio of 10.2.
The company’s average cost of borrowings was 7.2% p.a. in Fiscal 2009.
Net cash flow at the operating level was Rs. 96,881 million in Fiscal 2009 and has been positive at the net level.
More than 90% of NTPC’s sales of electricity are to SEBs and state owned distribution companies for which payments are secured through LCs and the Tripartite Agreements. The agreement, was signed by the Centre, the RBI and the State governments in 2003, to prevent payment defaults by States to central public sector utilities and ensuring the timely payment and mitigate the risk of a payment default. This helps the company to reduce its supply to defaulting states and its customers. Resultantly, there are lower bad debts that would otherwise impact the company’s performance.
NTPC has formed a consulting business to leverage its technical and operational skills and knowledge base, domestically and internationally. Total revenues from this increased to Rs. 1,325 million in Fiscal 2009 from Rs. 341 million in Fiscal 2004. Increasing contribution of income from this source will benefit the company as it is a fee-based activity. More importantly, while the consulting business may not impact the topline, it may have a significant impact on the bottomline as the margins are higher.
Positives
High Plant Load Factors ( PLF): In Fiscal 2009, NTPC’s coal-based stations operated at an average availability factor of 92.5%, and achieved an average PLF of 91.1%, compared to the all-India average PLF for coal-based stations of 77.2%. In Fiscal 2009, of the 15 coal-based power stations, four operated at a PLF of greater than 95.0% and one operated at a PLF of 99.4%. In Fiscal 2009, the gas-based stations operated at an average availability of 86.7% and an average PLF of 67.0%, compared to the all-India average PLF for gas-based stations of 57.6%. PLF of NTPC’s gas-based stations has improved to 78.4% in the first half of Fiscal 2010 due to increased gas availability. Its average selling price of electricity was Rs. 2.12 per unit in Fiscal 2009. This indicates high operational efficiencies.
Secured Sales Agreements: Currently, all the sales of electricity are made pursuant to long term PPAs. More than 90% of its sales are to SEBs and state owned distribution companies for which payments are secured through LCs and the Tripartite Agreements (“Tripartite Agreements”). For private distribution company customers, payments are secured through letters of credit backed by a first charge created on their receivables in the company’s favour. This secures its income against bad debts.
Merchant Sale Boost: The Government has recently proposed to earmark 10 per cent of the NTPC's total capacity for merchant sale. Under this process, NTPC would be able sell power at market driven rates in the open market (through merchant basis). As the rates for Merchant sales of power is higher as compared to the long-term tariffs or PPAs, it will have a positive impact on the bottomline of the company and also its margins.
High Revenue Visibility: Government of India (GoI) being the promoter of the company, NTPC enters into a Memorandum of Understanding with the GoI for its annual performance targets. For its coal-based stations, the term of the PPA for most stations is 25 years, while for its gas-based stations, the term of the PPA for most stations is 15 years. For Hydroelectric Projects it is 35 years. As on 31st March, 2009, the entire output of the company’s power stations has been contracted for, under these PPAs. This provides high revenue visibility.
De-Risking through Diversification: The company has initiated concrete efforts towards diversification of its product mix. It is currently constructing hydroelectric power projects. As of September 30, 2009, 1,920 MW of capacity is under construction and 552 MW is under bidding. It aims to have 9,000 MW by Fiscal 2017 and another 1000 MW of power from renewable energy projects. In the long run, this will de-risk the company’s business model.
It has a power trading subsidiary, NVVN, which has grown to become the second largest power trader in India. In order to incentivize the development of solar power in India, the GoI has designated NVVN as the nodal agency for the purchase of up to 1,000 MW of solar power commissioned by Fiscal 2013 under the National Solar Mission and sale after bundling an equivalent MW capacity from its stations.
If the plans progress as planned, the company’s business model would be fairly diversified.
Backward Integration: The company has been awarded eight coal mining blocks by the GoI, including two blocks awarded for development under a joint venture with Coal India Limited. This enables it to secure fuel security. Further the company has ventured into equipment manufacturing, to ensure the supply of critical equipment and spare parts, and an electricity distribution business. As and when this progresses, it will have better control over its costs.
Fuel Security: As of September 30, 2009, the company has signed long term Coal Supply Agreements covering 12 of it 15 coal-based stations. It has also executed gas supply agreements with GAIL for the supply of gas for our gas-based power stations, which are valid up to 2021.
Proximity to Fuel Sources: Over 86.0% of the total generation capacity is coal based, and ten out of 15 of coal-based stations, representing 83.0% of its total coal-based capacity is located in the range of 7 to 80 kilometres from the coal mines that supply them. The company has its own Merry-go-Round (MGR) rail system for transporting coal from the coal mines to the generating stations. Further, all the gas-based stations are located along major gas pipelines. This results in efficient supplies and lower transportation cost for the company.
Tax Benefits: The company enjoys several tax benefits on account of its presence in the power sector which is a crucial segment of the infrastructure industry.
Concerns
Project Delay Risk: As of September 30, 2009, the company added 3,240 MW during the Eleventh Plan, and is presently engaged in construction activities for projects representing 17,930 MW (including 4,000 MW undertaken by joint venture companies). NTPC has added only 4.2 GW of new generation capacity to date in the 11th Plan and expects to add another 18.2GW in the next two years (81% of the 11th Plan target). The Central Electricity Authority (CEA), a Government of India organisation, expects only 13.8GW of capacity addition. Given that the returns for the company are fixed , capacity expansion is the key to growth and hence needs to be monitored carefully. Power projects being long gestation projects, there is always the possibility of unforeseeable implementation delays which could lead to cost and time overruns.
Pending Litigation against Reliance Industries (RIL): As of September 30, 2009, the company has seven gas-based power stations in India, which account for 14.00% of its power generation capacity. The Company had issued a letter of intent to RIL pursuant to which, the terms and conditions were to be governed by the provisions of a gas sale and purchase agreement. However, RIL has refused to execute a gas sale and purchase agreement and NTPC has filed a civil suit against RIL for declaration and specific performance before the High Court of Bombay. If the verdict goes against NTPC, its operating performance maybe affected in terms of higher input costs.
Lack of Clarity over Merchant Power Sales: The terms of allowing merchant sale from the central Government quota of 15%, are unclear. This may not necessarily result in any significant upside in NTPC's numbers if the profits will have to be shared with states. NTPC is in the process of implementing 2,120 MW of power projects, as merchant power plants for selling power outside long-term PPAs at a market-based price.
Regulatory Intervention: Being in a highly regulated sector, NTPC is subject to political and policy changes. Any adverse development on either fronts, may adversely affect the company’s performance.
CONCLUDING NOTES
At the floor price of Rs. 201, NTPC trades at a PE of 19 of its FY 2010 earnings, which is not steep when compared to most of its peers (28 for Tata Power, 47 for JSW Energy). Even on the Price to Book parameter, NTPC scores over its peers. NTPC’s P/B ratio stands at 2.9 while that of Tata Power is at 3.5 and JSW Energy is 3.7.
In fact, most of the recently IPOs in the Power sector, commanded a hefty premium without having any capacities worth discussing in place. NTPC not only has efficient plants in place, but is also the undisputed market leader by a mile.
Further, NTPC’s FPO is being made using the French Auction model for institutional investors. Under this model, institutional investors can bid above the floor price and the allotment would be on a price priority basis. This mechanism will enable NTPC to get a better price for its shares and maximize its proceeds from the FPO. This process is based on the principle ‘Higher the Bid, higher the Allocation’.
Hence, there is a probability of not just a healthy price discovery by Institutional Investors but the emergence of strong hands holding the stock that could cap its downside risk.
Besides being the single largest beneficiary of potency of the power sector in India, the positives in this FPO far outweigh the negatives.
To sum up, discerning investors with a time frame of 15-18 months can consider full participation in this FPO.